Monday, December 26, 2016

Mauna Kea Protectors


Thirty meter Telescope protests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

       

The TMT, a ground-based, large segmented mirrorreflecting telescope grew from astronomers' prioritization in 2000 of a thirty-meter telescope to be built within the decade. Mauna Kea was announced as TMT's preferred site in 2009. Opposition to the project began shortly after the announcement of Mauna Kea as the chosen site out of 5 proposals. While opposition against the observatories on Mauna Kea has been ongoing since the first telescope this protest may be the most vocal. The project was expected to be completed by 2024, nearly simultaneously with the 39-meter European Extremely Large Telescope being built in Chile however, on December 2, 2015, the Supreme Court of Hawaii invalidated the TMT's building permits. The court ruled that due process was not followed. The TMT corporation has removed all construction equipment and vehicles from Mauna Kea.

Background[edit]

Development of Mauna Kea observatories[edit]

After studying photos for NASA's Apollo program that contained greater detail than any ground based telescope, Gerard Kuiper began seeking an arid site for infrared studies.[2][3]While he first began looking in Chile, he also made the decision to perform tests in the Hawaiian Islands. Tests on Maui's Haleakalā were promising but the mountain was too low in the inversion layer and often covered by clouds. On the "Big Island" of Hawaii, Mauna Kea is considered the highest island mountain in the world. While the summit is often covered with snow the air itself is extremely dry.[2] Kuiper began looking into the possibility of an observatory on Mauna Kea. After testing, he discovered the low humidity was perfect for infrared signals. He persuaded then Governor, John A. Burns to bulldoze a dirt road to the summit where he built a small telescope on Puʻu Poliʻahu, a cinder cone peak.[2][4][5] The peak was the second highest on the mountain with the highest peak being holy ground, so Kuiper avoided it.[6] Next, Kuiper tried enlisting NASA to fund a larger facility with a large telescope, housing and other needed structures. NASA, in turn decided to make the project open to competition. Professor of physics, John Jefferies of the University of Hawaii placed a bid on behalf of the university.[2][7][8] Jefferies had gained his reputation through observations at Sacramento Peak Observatory. The proposal was for a two-meter telescope to serve both the needs of NASA and the university. While large telescopes are not ordinarily awarded to universities without well established astronomers, Jefferies and UH were awarded the NASA contract infuriating Kuiper who felt that "his mountain" had been "stolen" from "him".[2][9] Kuiper would abandon his site (the very first telecope on Mauna Kea) over the competition and begin work in Arizona on a different NASA project. After considerable testing by Jefferies' team, the best locations were determined to be near the summit at the top of the cinder cones. Testing also determined Mauna Kea to be superb for nighttime viewing due to many factors including the thin air, constant trade winds and being surrounded by sea. Jefferies would build a 2.24 meter telescope with the State of Hawaii agreeing to build a reliable, all weather roadway to the summit. Building began in 1967 and first light seen in 1970.[2]

Observatory opposition[edit]

Opposition to the observatories has existed since 1964.[10] In Honolulu, the governor and legislature, enthusiastic about the development, set aside an even larger area for the observatory causing opposition in the city of Hilo. Native kānaka ʻōiwi believed the entire site was sacred and that developing the mountain, even for science, would spoil the area. Environmentalists were concerned about rare native bird populations and other citizens of Hilo were concerned about the sight of the domes from the city. Using town hall meetings, Jefferies was able to overcome opposition by weighing the economic advantage and prestige the island would receive.[2] There has been substantial opposition to the Mauna Kea observatories that continues to grow.[11] Over the years, the opposition to the observatories may have become the most visible example of the conflict western science has encountered over access and use of environmental and culturally significant sites.[12] Opposition to development grew shortly after expansion of the observatories commenced. Once access was opened up by the roadway to the summit, skiers began using it for recreation and objected when the road was closed as a precaution against vandalism when the telescopes were being built. Hunters voiced concerns as did the Hawaiian Audubon Society who were supported by Governor George Ariyoshi.[6]
The Audubon Society objected to further development on Mauna kea over concerns to habitat of the endangered palila, an endemic species to only specific parts of this mountain. The bird is the last of the finch billed honeycreepers existing on the island. Over 50% of native bird species had been killed off due to loss of habitat from early western settlers or the introduction of non native species competing for resources. Hunters and sportsmen were concerned that the hunting of feral animals would be affected by the telescope operations.[13] A "Save Mauna Kea" movement was inspired by the proliferation of telescopes with opposition believing development of the mountain to be sacrilegious.[14] Native Hawaiian non-profit groups such as Kahea, whose goals are the protection of cultural heritage and the environment, oppose development on Mauna Kea as a sacred space to the Hawaiian religion.[15] Today, Mauna Kea hosts the world's largest location for telescope observations in infrared and submillimeter astronomy. The land itself is protected by the US Historical Preservation Act due to its significance to Hawaiian culture but still allowed development.[16]

Outrigger telescopes[edit]

Further development of the Mauna kea observatories is still opposed by environmental groups and Native Hawaiians. A 2006 proposal for the Outrigger Telescopes to become extensions of the Keck Observatory was canceled after a judges determination that a full environmental impact statement must be prepared before any further development of the site.[17] The "outrigger" would have linked the Keck I and Keck II telescopes. Environmental groups and Native Hawaiian activist were a lot stronger at this time than in the past but NASA went ahead with the proposal for lack of an alternate site. The group Mauna Kea Anaina Hou made several arguments against the development including that Mauna Kea was a sacred mountain to Native Hawaiians where many deities, that lived the cinder cone being proposed was holy in Hawaiian tradition as a burial site for a demi-god. The group raised several other concerns such as environmental over native insects, the question of Ceded lands and an audit report, critical of the mountains management.[18]

Thirty Meter Telescope proposal[edit]


Kealoha Pisciotta, a former Mauna Kea Observatory employee, testifies at a State hearing in 2011
The Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) is a proposed extremely large, segmented mirror telescope, planned for the summit of Mauna Kea. It is now the focal point of further development of the observatory site, with a current ongoing legal battle in the Hawaii court system. The proposal continues to spawn a great deal of controversy over the use of the site for science.[19]
The TMT project is a response to recommendation in 2000 from the US National Academy of Sciences that a thirty-meter telescope be a top priority, and that it be built within the decade.[20] Urgency in construction is due to the competitive nature of science with the European-Extremely Large Telescope also under construction.[21] The two projects are also complementary, in that the EELT would only view the Southern Celestial Hemisphere, while Mauna Kea offers the best views of the Northern Celestial Hemisphere. However, Mauna Kea's summit is considered the most sacred of all the mountains in Hawaii to many Native Hawaiian people.[22][23][24] Native Hawaiian activists such as Kealoha Pisciotta, a former employee of the Mauna Kea Observatories, have raised concerns over the perceived desecration of Mauna Kea posed by TMT construction and presence.[25]Pisciotta, a former telescope systems specialist technician at James Clerk Maxwell Telescope, is one of several people suing to stop the construction[26] and is also director of Mauna Kea Anaina Hou.[27] However, some native Hawaiians do support the TMT project, including Peter Apo, a sitting trustee of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs.[28]
As of April, 2015, two separate legal appeals were still pending.[29]
The 1998 study Mauna Kea Science Reserve and Hale Pohaku Complex Development Plan Update stated that "... nearly all the interviewees and all others who participated in the consultation process (Appendices B and C) called for a moratorium on any further development on the summit of Mauna Kea".[30]Native Hawaiians and environmentalists are opposed to any further telescopes.[27]
The Hawaii Board of Land and Natural Resources conditionally approved the Mauna Kea site for the TMT in February 2011. While the approval has been challenged, the Board officially approved the site following a hearing on April 12, 2013.[31]

Indigenous peoples rights[edit]

The issue of native peoples, their religious freedom and rights in regards to authority for large science-based projects has become a major issue to contend with. Mt. Graham had an issue with the sanctity of the mountain raised by activists. Observatories have succeeded in being built, but only after protracted and expensive litigation and effort.

Blockade and protests[edit]


Hawaiian cultural practitioner, Joshua Lanakila Mangauil interrupted the TMT ground breaking on October 7, 2014

Roadway blockade and ground breaking interruption[edit]

On October 7, 2014 the groundbreaking for the telescope was being live streamed via webcam. The proceedings were interrupted when the official caravan encountered several dozen demonstrators picketing and chanting in the middle of the roadway. A planned ceremony at the base of the mountain was scheduled by the group, Mauna Kea Anaina Hou, in opposition of the telescope[32] and in a press release dated that day, the organization Sacred Mauna Kea stated: "Native Hawaiians and non-Hawaiians will gather for a peaceful protest against the Astronomy industry and the State of Hawaii’s ground-breaking ceremony for a thirty-meter telescope (TMT) on the summit of Mauna Kea."[33] Several members traveled up the mountain and were stopped by police, where they laid down in the road and blocked the caravan. The nonviolent protest did not stop or block any people but when the ceremony for the ground breaking began, protesters interrupted the blessing, stopping the proceedings as well as the groundbreaking.[32]
That same day in California, protesters demonstrated outside the headquarters of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation in Palo Alto, CA.[34][35]

Second Mauna Kea blockade and arrests, 2015[edit]

Beginning in late March 2015 demonstrators halted construction crews near the visitors center, again by blocking access of the road to the summit of the mountain. Heavy equipment had already been placed near the site. Daniel Meisenzahl, a spokesman for the University of Hawaii, stated that the 5 tractors trailers of equipment that were moved up the mountain the day before had alerted protesters that began organizing the demonstrations. Kamahana Kealoha of the group Sacred Mauna Kea stated that over 100 demonstrators had traveled up to the summit to camp overnight, to be joined by more protesters in the early morning to blockade crews.[36] On April 2, 2015, 300 protesters were gathered near the visitor's center where 12 people were arrested. 11 more protesters were arrested at the summit.[37] Protesters, ranging in age from 27 to 75 years of age were handcuffed and led away by local police.[38] Among the major concerns of the protest groups is whether the land appraisals were done accurately and that Native Hawaiians were not consulted. When the trucks were finally allowed to pass, protesters followed the procession up the summit. A project spokesman said that work had begun after arrests were made and the road cleared.
Among the arrests was professional surfer and former candidate for mayor of Kauai, Dustin Barca. A number of celebrity activists of Native Hawaiian descent, both local and national, began campaigning over social media, including Game of Thrones star Jason Mamoa who urged Dwayne Johnson (The Rock) to join the protests with him on top of Mauna Kea.[39] Construction was halted for one week at the request of Hawaii state governor David Ige on April 7, 2015 after the protest on Mauna Kea continued and demonstrations began to appear over the state. Project Manager, Gary Sanders stated that TMT agreed to the one week stop for continued dialogue. Kealoha Pisciotta, president of Mauna Kea Anaina Hou viewed the development as positive but said opposition to the project would continue.[40] Pisciotta also stated that the protests would continue to be within a Kapu Aloha"moving in Aloha with steadfast determination".[41]

Temporary halt[edit]

Governor Ige announced that the project was being temporarily postponed until at least April 20, 2015.[42] In response to the growing protests the TMT Corporation's division of Hawaii Community Affairs launched an internet microsite, updating content regularly.[43] The company also took to social media to respond to the opposition's growing momentum by hiring public relations firms to assist as the company's voice in the islands.[44]

Demonstrators call themselves "Protectors", not protestors

Continued local demonstrations[edit]

The protests sparked statewide, national as well as international attention to Hawaiian culture, Mauna Kea and the 45-year history of 13 other telescopes on the mountain.
At the University of Hawaii Manoa, hundreds of students lined the streets for blocks and, one by one, they passed the stones from the student taro patch of the university's Center on Hawaiian Studies down the human chain to the lawn in front of the office university president, David Lassner, where the stones were used to build an ahu (the altar of a heiau) as a message to the university.[45]
On April 21, 2015, hundreds of protesters filled the streets of Honolulu protesting against the TMT.[46]

Permit invalidated[edit]

On December 2, 2015, the Supreme Court of Hawaii invalidated the TMT's building permits, ruling that due process was not followed when the Board of Land and Natural Resources approved the permit before the contested case hearing. The TMT company chairman stated: "T.M.T. will follow the process set forth by the state..".[47][48] On December 16, the TMT corporation began removal of all construction equipment and vehicles from Mauna Kea.[49]

Kurdish advances and problems in 2016

This analysis may be published by a student organization, Association des États Généraux des Étudiants de l’Europe. The request for comment is in German:   KOMMENTARE ZU DIESEM ARTIKEL.  If if this is a student magizine, that adds to its interest.  In any event, the analysis rings true to me.



ANALYSIS Kurds enjoy their gains in Iraq, Syria, but eye Turkey nervously By Jan Kuhlmann und Can Merey, dpa | EUROPE ONLINE  


Europe 25.12.2016

By our dpa-correspondent and Europe Online         

The year 2016 brought a swirling tide of mixed fortune for the Kurds. They enabled the West to fight Islamic State forces in Syria, and grew stronger through their part in offensives in neighbouring Iraq. But those wins came as Turkey made life tough at home for its Kurds. 

Istanbul (dpa) - Only two years ago, Kurds in Syria emerged victorious from a fight that could have sealed their extinction. 

While Islamic State forces seemed certain to take the border city of Kobane, Kurdish fighters repulsed the onslaught and marked a turning point, in the civil war and their own history. 

The oppressed ethnic minority has since emerged as a leading power in the six-year conflict wracking Syria. Today, the Kurdish YPG militia controls most of the border with Turkey. To the west, the YPG crossed the Euphrates River and is pushing south towards the IS-stronghold of al-Raqqa. 
Politically, the Kurds have also effectively advanced their demand for a fully self-run autonomous Kurdish region in northern Syria. 

Kurdish units became the key partner of the US-led international coalition against Islamic State, doing the ground fighting and sparing the military alliance from having to deploy troops. Never has global political recognition of the Syrian Kurds been as great as now. 

The same applies to the Iraqi Kurds. True, they have taken losses from Islamic State forces, but they have also benefited from supplies of weapons and training given to the Kurdish Peshmerga fighters by the US, Germany and other Western states. Until recently a crude guerrilla-style force, the Peshmerga have now evolved into an army in its own right.
While pushing back Islamic State forces, the Kurds extended their dominion in the north of Iraq, much to the dismay of the central government in Baghdad, which looked on powerlessly. Today, the long- cherished prospect of Kurdish independence no longer seems an illusion. 

And yet 2016 was mixed for the Kurds. Compared with Iraq and Syria, the Kurdish minority in Turkey has nowhere near as many reasons to optimism.
In June 2015 they celebrated the entry of the Peoples‘ Democratic Party (HDP) as the first pro-Kurdish party to enter the parliament in Ankara. It was a short-lived joy. A year later the immunity of almost all HDP deputies was lifted at the behest of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who sees the party as an extension of the banned Kurdistan Workers‘ Party (PKK). 

Ten HDP deputies are now under investigation, including both party leaders, and many of their colleagues also face trial. Under emergency measures Erdogan imposed after a coup attempt in mid-July, the authorities also shut down Kurdish media and organizations the government accuses of having ties with the PKK.  

Meanwhile, the PKK has also done its part in escalating violence after a peace process collapsed in the summer of 2015. 

Some Kurds in Turkey consider the situation worse than during the civil war in the 1990s, when the conflict took place mainly in rural areas. This time the PKK is waging its fight in Kurdish cities, entrenching its fighters in residential areas while the Turkish army uses tanks and artillery against them, razing whole districts. 

It‘s possible that the PKK‘s goal was to tie up the army in the urban struggle in south-east Turkey so as to delay military action against the Kurdish militia in northern Iraq. 
Whatever their strategy, the cost was high - hundreds of people have been killed, including many civilians. 

Meanwhile, a splinter group of the PKK - the TAK - has sown terror in western Turkey, killing dozens in bomb attacks in Ankara and Istanbul. And there is no visible end to this escalation, let alone a new peace process, with Erdogan pledging to destroy the PKK with an "iron fist". 

At the same time, the president does not limit his tough stance to the borders of his country. 
Forces from the NATO member country have invaded Syria in support of rebel militias like Islamic State, but also against the YPG militia, which has close ties with the PKK. 

Ankara wants at all costs to prevent the Kurds from uniting their enclave at Afrin in the west of the country with areas they hold further east. The two sides have battled for weeks, putting the West in a difficult situation in Syria, where it is allied with two sides fighting each other. All attempts to mediate have so far failed, making a swift peaceful solution to the conflict even more unlikely. 

Away from the frontlines, the crisis faced by Iraq‘s Kurds has slipped from the world‘s attention. Low oil prices have hammered the Kurdish autonomous regions, and the many half-finished buildings in the once booming Kurdish capital of Erbil now only remind of better times. State employees regularly take to the streets because their salaries are not paid. 

Kurdish President Massud Barsani, a respected partner of the West, is also fuelling the crisis by staying at the region‘s helm more than a year after his term of office expired. The opposition accuses him of imposing a dictatorship, while the Kurdish parliament currently only exists on paper.
It‘s a situation that is acutely felt by the speaker of the Kurdish Parliament, Yusif Mohammed, from the opposition party Gorran (Change). In a stark reflection of the challenges facing the Kurds and the path into their future, he remains barred from Erbil by Barani‘s security forces.